<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ZERO ENRICHMENT IN IRAN—OR NO NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN THE MIDDLE EAST?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raceforiran.com/zero-enrichment-in-iran%e2%80%94or-no-nuclear-weapons-in-the-middle-east/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/zero-enrichment-in-iran%e2%80%94or-no-nuclear-weapons-in-the-middle-east</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:06:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Julian Juarez</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/zero-enrichment-in-iran%e2%80%94or-no-nuclear-weapons-in-the-middle-east#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Juarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=948#comment-36</guid>
		<description>It is important that the American people, particularly the one who are in decision making positions, know this kind of arguments when considering the situation in the Middle East. Many States defend the right of every country to develop nuclear energy with peaceful purposes with the supervision of the IAEA, and Iran can not be taken as an exception. This country has the right to enrich uranium if it has the capabilities. Of course, the internationa comunity must be sure that Iran will not deviate its nuclear programme to militar purposes.
Regarding the NWFZ I, as a Mexican, consider that it could be a slution to everybody&#039;s security concerns in the Middle East, including Israel and Iran.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is important that the American people, particularly the one who are in decision making positions, know this kind of arguments when considering the situation in the Middle East. Many States defend the right of every country to develop nuclear energy with peaceful purposes with the supervision of the IAEA, and Iran can not be taken as an exception. This country has the right to enrich uranium if it has the capabilities. Of course, the internationa comunity must be sure that Iran will not deviate its nuclear programme to militar purposes.<br />
Regarding the NWFZ I, as a Mexican, consider that it could be a slution to everybody&#8217;s security concerns in the Middle East, including Israel and Iran.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turki AlFaisal</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/zero-enrichment-in-iran%e2%80%94or-no-nuclear-weapons-in-the-middle-east#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Turki AlFaisal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=948#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Finally, a rational approach that comes from two eminent experts on Iran and the Middle East. It was the Iranian government that first introduced the nuclear free zone in the Middle East in 1974. Since then Iran has not renounced the idea.A reward regime for countries that join and a sanctions regime for those that don&#039;t will have to be part of the scheme; as well as a nuclear security umbrella for the zone by the the five permanent members of the Security Council. Level the playing field and then ask everybody to play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, a rational approach that comes from two eminent experts on Iran and the Middle East. It was the Iranian government that first introduced the nuclear free zone in the Middle East in 1974. Since then Iran has not renounced the idea.A reward regime for countries that join and a sanctions regime for those that don&#8217;t will have to be part of the scheme; as well as a nuclear security umbrella for the zone by the the five permanent members of the Security Council. Level the playing field and then ask everybody to play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

