<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Japan Working Behind The Scenes On Uranium Enrichment Swap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:40:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rfjk</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap#comment-4125</link>
		<dc:creator>rfjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 21:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1820#comment-4125</guid>
		<description>Prior to Nixon going to China public &amp; private statements in the media regarding China were 100% bad, some bordering insane hysteria. The fact dialog veers from one end of the spectrum to another isn&#039;t just confusing, it informs an argument is going on between and within the foreign policy establishments of both countries. Also, the Japs aren&#039;t the only country &quot;working behind the scenes&quot; on behalf of Iranians and the US. Normalized relations are in the economic and security interests of many countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prior to Nixon going to China public &amp; private statements in the media regarding China were 100% bad, some bordering insane hysteria. The fact dialog veers from one end of the spectrum to another isn&#8217;t just confusing, it informs an argument is going on between and within the foreign policy establishments of both countries. Also, the Japs aren&#8217;t the only country &#8220;working behind the scenes&#8221; on behalf of Iranians and the US. Normalized relations are in the economic and security interests of many countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Sutton</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap#comment-4091</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Sutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1820#comment-4091</guid>
		<description>More on this today/yesterday at nytimes.com with Iran saying we are close to a deal, with no mention of Japan.  And then Gates saying basically that we are not close to a deal and pointing to the original US one shipment 100% proposal.  The public statements are not encouraging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on this today/yesterday at nytimes.com with Iran saying we are close to a deal, with no mention of Japan.  And then Gates saying basically that we are not close to a deal and pointing to the original US one shipment 100% proposal.  The public statements are not encouraging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rfjk</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap#comment-3756</link>
		<dc:creator>rfjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1820#comment-3756</guid>
		<description>BINGO!

&quot;The key point is that Obama wants a deal and the Iranians want a deal&quot; nails this puppy hard and high to the wall. Each leader reflects a consensus desire among their respective &quot;establishments&quot; of power. Its just 30 years of conflict, long indoctrinated public&#039;s and extremist factions each has to contend with that&#039;s making the inevitable a little difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BINGO!</p>
<p>&#8220;The key point is that Obama wants a deal and the Iranians want a deal&#8221; nails this puppy hard and high to the wall. Each leader reflects a consensus desire among their respective &#8220;establishments&#8221; of power. Its just 30 years of conflict, long indoctrinated public&#8217;s and extremist factions each has to contend with that&#8217;s making the inevitable a little difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap#comment-3750</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1820#comment-3750</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll see.  The key point is that Obama wants a deal and the Iranians want a deal.  

Each has to find a way that is sellable to their own electorate, and that has become particularly complicated in Iran.  In what looks like a shift on that score, Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying yesterday that if the LEU wasn&#039;t returned, they could just make some more.

Things are happening, but both sides have this sewn up so tight that I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll know much in advance of an actual deal being struck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll see.  The key point is that Obama wants a deal and the Iranians want a deal.  </p>
<p>Each has to find a way that is sellable to their own electorate, and that has become particularly complicated in Iran.  In what looks like a shift on that score, Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying yesterday that if the LEU wasn&#8217;t returned, they could just make some more.</p>
<p>Things are happening, but both sides have this sewn up so tight that I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll know much in advance of an actual deal being struck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lysander</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap#comment-3725</link>
		<dc:creator>Lysander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 04:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1820#comment-3725</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s certainly a surprising turn of events, if true. IMHO, it would be a very bad idea for Iran to turn over in one lump sum 70% of it&#039;s Uranium and hope the west will return it later. Domestically, it would allow the Greens to attack the government&#039;s national security credentials. If later the uranium is not returned, they will look like fools who gave away a valuable strategic asset in exchange for magic beans.

With so little information out now, we can only speculate. It may be that Iran is taking a page from the west&#039;s play book. Meaning that they seemingly agree to the deal while attaching a few conditions such as time of delivery, etc., that the US will not accept it.

Also, it is possible Iran was offered something else such as the US will not oppose Japanese investment in Iran. Also, if the west reneges, perhaps Iran will have China&#039;s and Russia&#039;s backing to enrich to 20% themselves.

But of course it&#039;s too early to say and speculation is worth very little until we know more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s certainly a surprising turn of events, if true. IMHO, it would be a very bad idea for Iran to turn over in one lump sum 70% of it&#8217;s Uranium and hope the west will return it later. Domestically, it would allow the Greens to attack the government&#8217;s national security credentials. If later the uranium is not returned, they will look like fools who gave away a valuable strategic asset in exchange for magic beans.</p>
<p>With so little information out now, we can only speculate. It may be that Iran is taking a page from the west&#8217;s play book. Meaning that they seemingly agree to the deal while attaching a few conditions such as time of delivery, etc., that the US will not accept it.</p>
<p>Also, it is possible Iran was offered something else such as the US will not oppose Japanese investment in Iran. Also, if the west reneges, perhaps Iran will have China&#8217;s and Russia&#8217;s backing to enrich to 20% themselves.</p>
<p>But of course it&#8217;s too early to say and speculation is worth very little until we know more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap#comment-3713</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1820#comment-3713</guid>
		<description>Well, of course the Iranian government csme out today and said, in substance, it wants to do the swap. Once again, we have to wait and see if they&#039;re serious or just playing games.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, of course the Iranian government csme out today and said, in substance, it wants to do the swap. Once again, we have to wait and see if they&#8217;re serious or just playing games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: masoud</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap#comment-3708</link>
		<dc:creator>masoud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1820#comment-3708</guid>
		<description>Highly unlikely. Iran seems to be ready to announce that it will fabricate the fuel itself on Feb 11. This smells like the same kind of plant that had people expecting Iran to turn over it&#039;s stockpile of enriched uranium in October in order to continue talks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Highly unlikely. Iran seems to be ready to announce that it will fabricate the fuel itself on Feb 11. This smells like the same kind of plant that had people expecting Iran to turn over it&#8217;s stockpile of enriched uranium in October in order to continue talks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lysander</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap#comment-3685</link>
		<dc:creator>Lysander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1820#comment-3685</guid>
		<description>The even more pertinent question is: can Iran trust the Japanese? Do they really believe that japan would return the uranium if the US says otherwise? I sure don&#039;t. 

Because, as rfjk says, the Japanese wouldn&#039;t touch this without US say so. They also won&#039;t return the uranium without US say so. Iran might as well ship the uranium here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The even more pertinent question is: can Iran trust the Japanese? Do they really believe that japan would return the uranium if the US says otherwise? I sure don&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Because, as rfjk says, the Japanese wouldn&#8217;t touch this without US say so. They also won&#8217;t return the uranium without US say so. Iran might as well ship the uranium here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rfjk</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap#comment-3664</link>
		<dc:creator>rfjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1820#comment-3664</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another poignant question. Does anyone here believe the Japs would touch this with a 10 ft. pole if the US was opposed to it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s another poignant question. Does anyone here believe the Japs would touch this with a 10 ft. pole if the US was opposed to it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/japan-working-behind-the-scenes-on-uranium-enrichment-swap#comment-3660</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1820#comment-3660</guid>
		<description>The question is: are the Iranians serious about a swap, or just playing for time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is: are the Iranians serious about a swap, or just playing for time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

