<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gates Predicts More Sanctions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.raceforiran.com/gates-predicts-more-sanctions/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/gates-predicts-more-sanctions</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:56:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pirouz</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/gates-predicts-more-sanctions#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirouz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 11:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1103#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I agree Ben. On many points, especially Iran, I&#039;m disappointed with my vote for Obama. I suppose we should have seen this coming with his cabinet picks, in particular Ross and Clinton. These two figures are openly pro-Zionist and anti-Iran.

It&#039;s looking like the only question mark is China, whether they&#039;ll assume the lead in advocating moderation or simply give in to a consensus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Ben. On many points, especially Iran, I&#8217;m disappointed with my vote for Obama. I suppose we should have seen this coming with his cabinet picks, in particular Ross and Clinton. These two figures are openly pro-Zionist and anti-Iran.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s looking like the only question mark is China, whether they&#8217;ll assume the lead in advocating moderation or simply give in to a consensus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanctions</title>
		<link>http://www.raceforiran.com/gates-predicts-more-sanctions#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>sanctions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.raceforiran.com/?p=1103#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Be careful you don&#039;t give too much credit to the Iranians.....

You guys were so optimistic about the prospect that the Iranians might accept the nuclear compromise deal. Now, all of a sudden, there&#039;s a problem with the proposal? It was a generous offer and a major first step. It certainly tested the intentions of the Iranians. Now we see how serious the Iranians are about reorienting U.S.-Iranian relations.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful you don&#8217;t give too much credit to the Iranians&#8230;..</p>
<p>You guys were so optimistic about the prospect that the Iranians might accept the nuclear compromise deal. Now, all of a sudden, there&#8217;s a problem with the proposal? It was a generous offer and a major first step. It certainly tested the intentions of the Iranians. Now we see how serious the Iranians are about reorienting U.S.-Iranian relations&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

